From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23216 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 15:47:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 15:47:52 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmwqJ-00056q-1e for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:47:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 11774 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2004 15:47:46 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19322 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 15:47:46 +0000 From: Jason Huebel Reply-To: jhuebel@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:53:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407191634.10196.jhuebel@gentoo.org> <10774.205.241.48.33.1090283266.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> In-Reply-To: <10774.205.241.48.33.1090283266.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407201053.45459.jhuebel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] GRP for amd64 X-Archives-Salt: 2939f0de-086d-4767-bf90-600df2c934c6 X-Archives-Hash: 74c5ea49b5168326088a08778fa883e5 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 July 2004 07:27 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Something screwy happened here, and I've been on vacation. tseng should > have fixed the problem by reverting to an older patchset version Friday, > however. Well, that's not so much the problem as the fact that xfree is merging at a= ll. =20 Interestingly, I had a full GRP set already built from an older snapshot=20 (20040626) and figured that rebuilding with the newer snapshot (20040716)=20 wouldn't be a problem. Apparently I was wrong. So whatever changed in portage that caused xfree to merge happened in the p= ast=20 three weeks. I'm disappointed that GRP is getting dropped from amd64 for 2004.2. But si= nce=20 all the LiveCDs and stages are now basedon the newer snapshot, the old GRP= =20 set I built isn't particularly useful. =2D --=20 Jason Huebel Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter GPG Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x9BA9E230 "Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA/UAJbNgbbJup4jARApnDAJ99SQXBVATbV6NkFF9DUkNyecwHewCfVe47 7hxQaHEELL8XlY9KDQiqM7U=3D =3Dltg6 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list