From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26480 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2004 00:04:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Jul 2004 00:04:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BhGxi-0007qs-KZ for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:03:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 15269 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2004 00:03:58 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15173 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2004 00:03:57 +0000 Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:03:54 -0400 From: Jon Portnoy To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040705000354.GA28356@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <550086E6-CE0C-11D8-9D85-0003938E7E46@gentoo.org> <20040704233118.GA26605@cerberus.oppresses.us> <40E89848.1060202@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E89848.1060202@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources X-Archives-Salt: 6fe8645e-36d3-451a-b29c-d0ed6a5701fe X-Archives-Hash: 0cc552beee61592115f5a3f86a0f4420 On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 01:52:40AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Jon Portnoy wrote: > >ChangeLog is useful: > > > > 21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman > > +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild: > > Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package > > Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone > >package > > (and the code style was horrible...) > > > I'd like to have those "coding style" issues pointed out, so I could fix > them. > I can agree that the current way I'm using to *building* it isn't really > the sanest but as I stated many times: I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO > KERNELIFY UCL and since ucl is giving good results even if I just took > the compiled objects and I glue them in a kernel wrapper that was a good > solution. I'm under exams and I can't reimplement ucl in kernel as > happened for zlib. > If the issue is really in the code (not the way it got linked) please > tell me as soon as possible. > > Regards > > lu > > PS: Better comunication could avoid such _lack_ of style in Changelogs. > I recommend sending this to the kernel folks, not -releng. (I don't think Greg's on this list) -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list