[gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources

[gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources

[Pieter Van den Abeele]

Hi,

I was told latest gentoo-dev-sources lacks gcloop. Can anyone verify 
and correct.

Best regards,

Pieter Van den Abeele


--
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources

[Jon Portnoy]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 12:48:56AM +0200, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was told latest gentoo-dev-sources lacks gcloop. Can anyone verify 
> and correct.
> 

ChangeLog is useful:

  21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@gentoo.org>
  +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild:
  Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package
  Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone 
package
        (and the code style was horrible...)

-- 
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net

--
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources

[Luca Barbato]

Jon Portnoy wrote:
> ChangeLog is useful:
> 
>   21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@gentoo.org>
>   +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild:
>   Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package
>   Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone 
> package
>         (and the code style was horrible...)
> 
I'd like to have those "coding style" issues pointed out, so I could fix 
them.
I can agree that the current way I'm using to *building* it isn't really 
the sanest but as I stated many times: I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO 
KERNELIFY UCL and since ucl is giving good results even if I just took 
the compiled objects and I glue them in a kernel wrapper that was a good 
solution. I'm under exams and I can't reimplement ucl in kernel as 
happened for zlib.
If the issue is really in the code (not the way it got linked) please 
tell me as soon as possible.

Regards

lu

PS: Better comunication could avoid such _lack_ of style in Changelogs.

-- 
Luca Barbato
Developer
Gentoo Linux				http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero



--
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-releng] gentoo-dev-sources

[Jon Portnoy]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 01:52:40AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Jon Portnoy wrote:
> >ChangeLog is useful:
> >
> >  21 Jun 2004; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@gentoo.org>
> >  +gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r2.ebuild:
> >  Removed 2710_amd76x-acpi.patch as it can be a standalone package
> >  Removed 4720_gcloop-2.6-20040510.patch as it can be a standalone 
> >package
> >        (and the code style was horrible...)
> >
> I'd like to have those "coding style" issues pointed out, so I could fix 
> them.
> I can agree that the current way I'm using to *building* it isn't really 
> the sanest but as I stated many times: I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO 
> KERNELIFY UCL and since ucl is giving good results even if I just took 
> the compiled objects and I glue them in a kernel wrapper that was a good 
> solution. I'm under exams and I can't reimplement ucl in kernel as 
> happened for zlib.
> If the issue is really in the code (not the way it got linked) please 
> tell me as soon as possible.
> 
> Regards
> 
> lu
> 
> PS: Better comunication could avoid such _lack_ of style in Changelogs.
> 

I recommend sending this to the kernel folks, not -releng. (I don't 
think Greg's on this list)

-- 
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net

--
gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list