From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2507 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 19:16:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 19:16:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJH0x-0003gJ-Mh for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:16:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 13109 invoked by uid 50004); 29 Apr 2004 19:16:07 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31182 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 19:16:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:16:03 +0200 From: Sven Vermeulen To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040429191603.GC10325@gentoo.org> References: <1083124338.2585.14.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> <1083188173.8092.3.camel@aquinas.natemccallum.com> <20040428215250.GO13780@mail.lieber.org> <1083189497.2115.3.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> <20040428233335.GS13780@mail.lieber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040428233335.GS13780@mail.lieber.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Gentoo 2004.1 Release X-Archives-Salt: cd2fe439-f924-46fa-9329-bf681033a06c X-Archives-Hash: 701494f9223385276dacc9490e11f2e1 --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 07:33:36PM -0400, Kurt Lieber wrote: > There are a number of managers and developers who are concerned with the > viability/purpose and value of GRP. At some point, we will need to > re-visit this and decide if it's in the best interests of Gentoo to > continue supporting, let alone expanding. As Daniel stated already, I don't think we will ever get to the point where GRP will be discontinued in it's current form. Gentoo's always been about choices and always will.=20 I'm not in favor of GRP myself, but I've got sufficient feedback to know that it's a frequently used aspect of the Gentoo installation. Personally, I think that developers disliking GRP should just continue with disliking GRP and doing the job(s) they want and keep the GRP development to the develope= rs=20 that are interested in the GRP development.=20 Sounds easy doesn't it? :) Unless I'm being totally freaky here (which is possible as I've drank too much Red Bulls) all this is contained in the "choices" keyword. Same discussion goes for genkernel too.=20 Wkr, Sven Vermeulen --=20 ^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good. (oo) Sven Vermeulen (__) http://www.gentoo.org Documentation & PR --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAkVRzXfqz7M26L9sRAoskAJ9h0etaNiozZqLGOGdoAQaiXlKZFQCfZqGB bS7EaE1ihT3MxEKvESs8MIw= =A+zp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8--