From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32609 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2004 21:23:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Sep 2004 21:23:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C9s73-0004sh-Ag for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:23:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 1407 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2004 21:23:48 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9819 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2004 21:23:47 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni Reply-To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org To: solar@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1095800394.25582.1920.camel@simple> References: <1095698465.10417.24.camel@antares.hausnetz> <1095772410.27691.245.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1095793257.25582.1683.camel@simple> <1095799385.7808.110.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1095800394.25582.1920.camel@simple> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vOV8hZaMpF8IZMmVLm2I" Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1095801726.7814.144.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:22:07 -0400 Subject: [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles X-Archives-Salt: f83cc1e5-da56-48fc-89e0-8da7e8177a76 X-Archives-Hash: c6f10e5e93632de5841af7147ddfa732 --=-vOV8hZaMpF8IZMmVLm2I Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 16:59, Ned Ludd wrote: > Hey man.. :-) >=20 > I hope you didn't misinterpret the last mail as any sort of attack on or > towards you. The RE: to you was just as good as anybody in my minds eye. I didn't think that was an attack at all. I was trying to be a little humorous, since I was pretty much for the removal all along and you went into this pretty long, but quite informative spiel on the evils of USE=3Dacl. > Glad your able to save a few cpu cycles and QA becomes much cleaner and > simpler for/by default. Definitely. In fact, I had tried to remove the acl/attr packages at one point and it broke things like "ls", so needless to say I was a bit miffed. My current stance on the LiveCD is any byte saved is one less byte wasted on the mirrors. > -peace Ditto... --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux Is your power animal a penguin? --=-vOV8hZaMpF8IZMmVLm2I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBUJt7kT4lNIS36YERArU8AJ0ZZPgu5QHm1HpyDp/m9wvktbKusQCgkFm6 kIWUvaJ2Ysc7RTmlOyqHoFI= =gIkr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vOV8hZaMpF8IZMmVLm2I--