public inbox for gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Davis <zhen@gentoo.org>
To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:59:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092931140.16961.15.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092669014.8655.44.camel@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1935 bytes --]

On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 11:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 14:58, William Hubbs wrote:
> > I don't see why we need the yearly refreshes either.
> > 
> > I like the suggestion of making the names more descriptive in stead of using numbers.
> > Fore example, default/linux/am64.
> > Then, you might have default/linux/am64/gcc34.
> > Suppose that you decide to make the default am64 profile use gcc 3.4.  All you have to do is merge the am64/gcc34 profile into the am64 profile.
> > You could do this type of merging with any revision you want to become part of the default profile, and otherwise not change the default profile at all.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> So how does a user know the profile has changed?  What happens to users
> using the gcc34 profile?  What would this do to any of the proposed
> "stable" portage tree incarnations?
> 
> I'm all for a profile for each release which *never* changes.  Additions
> can be made as sub-profiles, but a profile never changes.  This way
> things act exactly the same every time.  Consistency is a REQUIREMENT
> for QA.
> 
> I think creating a profile for each release is very simple.  I've
> created one myself for 2004.2 and I can tell you that it sure was a hard
> 3 minutes of my life... *grin*
> 
> Having a stable profile is a definite requirement for any stable
> project.  Since we've been talking with the stable project guys, I think
> we definitely should not be discussing doing the exact opposite of what
> is needed to cooperate with them, especially on a separate list which
> they might not be subscribed to...

Chris -
I agree on all points. Does the stable team (are they a team) have a ML?

Cheers,
-- 
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>

----
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 4F9E 41F6 D072 5C1A 636C  2D46 B92C 4823 E281 41BB

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-19 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200408111331.30552.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
     [not found] ` <pan.2004.08.12.09.17.55.915519@cox.net>
     [not found]   ` <200408121001.42258.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
2004-08-12 17:36     ` [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-12 22:05       ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-12 23:20         ` John Davis
2004-08-12 23:36           ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13  0:52             ` John Davis
2004-08-13  1:08               ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13  3:29                 ` John Davis
     [not found]                   ` <1092375494.17392.1.camel@sephora>
2004-08-13 14:20                     ` John Davis
2004-08-13 14:49                       ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 13:39             ` Aron Griffis
2004-08-13 14:59               ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 18:58                 ` William Hubbs
2004-08-13 19:08                   ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 21:22                     ` William Hubbs
2004-08-15  1:19                       ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:10                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 15:59                     ` John Davis [this message]
2004-08-19 17:16                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 18:10                         ` Ned Ludd
2004-08-19 19:16                           ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-20 15:09             ` John Davis
2004-08-20 15:40               ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-20 16:20                 ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:00       ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-16 22:29         ` William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1092931140.16961.15.camel@woot.uberdavis.com \
    --to=zhen@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox