From: John Davis <zhen@gentoo.org>
To: seemant@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:20:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092406829.30635.37.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092375494.17392.1.camel@sephora>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 01:38, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> you know, this maybe silly, but I do kind of like not having version
> numbers at all, and maybe making the profile names more descriptive
>
> so in the amd64 profile, you'd have gcc34, for example
> and in all of them, we could have xfree and xorg profiles.
> Thoughts?
I could see either way working. The nice thing about your proposal is
that it cuts all of the bloat associated with version numbering. The
only con that I can see is that it does not offer a standardized way of
marking profile revisions like jhuebel's does (-r1, -r2, no matter what
the arch or the change).
Since this is a good comment, I am forwarding it to the list ;)
Regards,
--
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>
----
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 4F9E 41F6 D072 5C1A 636C 2D46 B92C 4823 E281 41BB
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-13 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200408111331.30552.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <pan.2004.08.12.09.17.55.915519@cox.net>
[not found] ` <200408121001.42258.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
2004-08-12 17:36 ` [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-12 22:05 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-12 23:20 ` John Davis
2004-08-12 23:36 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 0:52 ` John Davis
2004-08-13 1:08 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 3:29 ` John Davis
[not found] ` <1092375494.17392.1.camel@sephora>
2004-08-13 14:20 ` John Davis [this message]
2004-08-13 14:49 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 13:39 ` Aron Griffis
2004-08-13 14:59 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 18:58 ` William Hubbs
2004-08-13 19:08 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 21:22 ` William Hubbs
2004-08-15 1:19 ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:10 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 15:59 ` John Davis
2004-08-19 17:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 18:10 ` Ned Ludd
2004-08-19 19:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-20 15:09 ` John Davis
2004-08-20 15:40 ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-20 16:20 ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:00 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-16 22:29 ` William Hubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092406829.30635.37.camel@woot.uberdavis.com \
--to=zhen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=seemant@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox