public inbox for gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Davis <zhen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:52:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092358337.25075.1.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408121836.12316.jhuebel@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1860 bytes --]

On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 19:36, Jason Huebel wrote:
> On Thursday 12 August 2004 6:20 pm, John Davis wrote:
> > Precisely! When seemant and I first talked about the cascading profile
> > implementation, we had every intention of avoiding release specific
> > versioning scheme. AFAIK, this is still the case. I still think that
> > this is the best route to follow due to the fact that not much changes
> > between releases. If there are special cases (take xorg for example), we
> > can always make an exception to the rule.
> 
> Maybe it would make more sense to have yearly refreshes of the profiles, with 
> profile "revisions" during the year using -r#. For instance, 2004 would have:
> 
> default-linux/amd64/2004 (equivalent to the 2004.0 profile)
> default-linux/amd64/2004-r1 (equivalent to the 2004.2 profile)
> 
> Then next year (even though it isn't strictly necessary), we could have:
> 
> default-linux/amd64/2005
> 
> It would basically be the same as the last 2004 revision, but I can't think of 
> a better major version number than using the year.  Then we could have 
> revisions after that.
> 
> Actually, we might even be able to do something like this:
> 
> default-linux/amd64/2005/r0
> default-linux/amd64/2005/r1
> 
> ... and so on.  Thoughts?


I like the major versioning, but do we really need the minor versions? I
see that as a throwback to what we are doing now. The reason that I want
to drop release-based versioning is to avoid the needless replication of
data since the profiles between same year releases are so similar.

BTW - we really should start a GLEP about this ;)

Cheers,
-- 
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>

----
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 4F9E 41F6 D072 5C1A 636C  2D46 B92C 4823 E281 41BB

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-13  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200408111331.30552.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
     [not found] ` <pan.2004.08.12.09.17.55.915519@cox.net>
     [not found]   ` <200408121001.42258.jhuebel@gentoo.org>
2004-08-12 17:36     ` [gentoo-releng] Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2004.0 Profile Deprecated Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-12 22:05       ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-12 23:20         ` John Davis
2004-08-12 23:36           ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13  0:52             ` John Davis [this message]
2004-08-13  1:08               ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13  3:29                 ` John Davis
     [not found]                   ` <1092375494.17392.1.camel@sephora>
2004-08-13 14:20                     ` John Davis
2004-08-13 14:49                       ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 13:39             ` Aron Griffis
2004-08-13 14:59               ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 18:58                 ` William Hubbs
2004-08-13 19:08                   ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-13 21:22                     ` William Hubbs
2004-08-15  1:19                       ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:10                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 15:59                     ` John Davis
2004-08-19 17:16                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-19 18:10                         ` Ned Ludd
2004-08-19 19:16                           ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-20 15:09             ` John Davis
2004-08-20 15:40               ` Jason Huebel
2004-08-20 16:20                 ` John Davis
2004-08-16 15:00       ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-08-16 22:29         ` William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1092358337.25075.1.camel@woot.uberdavis.com \
    --to=zhen@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox