public inbox for gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Davis <zhen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] ppc bootable iso bugfix
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:02:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082642522.12052.3.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531DF9BE-9425-11D8-AE43-0003938E7E46@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1971 bytes --]

On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 02:21, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's why a good release cycle is needed:
> 
> We have started QA on live environment and kernel of the 2004.1 release 
> well in advance (even before the official releng date). I had 
> everything ready to be uploaded a week ago. Livecd booted ok (released 
> as _rc3 for testing). The only problem discovered was a missing /dev 
> directory on the stages (catalyst bug).
> 
> I did a cvs update to get the fix for this problem and rerolled the 
> stages. Until here everything fine. I noticed I had forgotten vim on 
> the older livecd, so I chrooted in it the stage1 and emerged vim 
> manually. I reran the stage2 and uploaded the result, assuming the cd 
> would be fine.
> 
> Apparently the stage2 was modified by the cvs update too, and added a 
> bunch of x86 rc-scripts to the default runlevel. These scripts called 
> for the x86 only 'hwsetup' (which gave an ugly error), tried 'detecting 
> the processor of the user' (which didn't work), tried loading APM bios 
> stuff (ppc has no BIOS)...
> 
> I am rebuilding the mini install and install cds (manually modified 
> catalyst to del instead of add the rc-scripts), updated versions 
> available today. Please note that in my REMARKS file in the catalyst 
> main directory, I already stated months ago that it was not a good idea 
> to assume all archs would use the same rc-scripts.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Pieter Van den Abeele
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list

Pieter - 
This is definitely a problem :/ Talk to agriffis about it as it sounds
like a baselayout bug - if there are any Catayst bugs that need fixing,
let me know and I will do it ASAP.

Cheers,
//zhen
-- 
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>

----
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338  FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2004-04-22 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22  6:21 [gentoo-releng] ppc bootable iso bugfix Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-04-22 14:02 ` John Davis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1082642522.12052.3.camel@woot.uberdavis.com \
    --to=zhen@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox