public inbox for gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-releng] genkernel status
@ 2004-04-14 14:13 Pieter Van den Abeele
  2004-04-14 14:54 ` John Davis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pieter Van den Abeele @ 2004-04-14 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-releng; +Cc: Pieter Van den Abeele

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1546 bytes --]

Hi,

Are we still going to be "dropping people to a shell so they can fix 
their shit" for 2004.1? Has anybody taken a look at the ppc initrd, 
which is simpler, commented and "shit"- & "idiot"- less?

Best regards,

Pieter Van den Abeele

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org>
> Date: Wed 14 Apr 2004 15:55:43 CEST
> To: gentoo-core@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-core] IMPORTANT: devrel procedure (long)
>
> Stewart Honsberger wrote:
>> I'm of the opinion we should forget positions, offices et al. and 
>> remain an open, cooperative community. Allow people's strengths to 
>> naturally take over to get problems solved.
>
> There needs to be some sort of structure in place or we will never be 
> seen seriously in the eyes of people who need to use it seriously.  It 
> is bad enough that things like "dropping you to a shell so you can fix 
> your shit" made it into the 2004.0 release, if everyone does whatever 
> they want[1], then we are setting ourselves up for a very hobbiest 
> distribution.  Yeah, it may already be a hobbiest distribution for 
> some of you, but for my employer it is a platform for our production 
> environment.
>
> [1] - you're really free to do whatever you want anyway if you're 
> willing to put the time and effort into it, but for the core Gentoo 
> distribution, lines need to be drawn and enforced.
>
> Cheers!
>
> -Corey
>
> -- 
> Corey Shields - Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team
> http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields
>
> --
> gentoo-core@gentoo.org mailing list
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/enriched, Size: 2049 bytes --]

Hi,


Are we still going to be "dropping people to a shell so they can fix
their shit" for 2004.1? Has anybody taken a look at the ppc initrd,
which is simpler, commented and "shit"- & "idiot"- less?


Best regards,


Pieter Van den Abeele


Begin forwarded message:


<excerpt><bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param><x-tad-bigger>From:
</x-tad-bigger></color></bold><x-tad-bigger>Corey Shields
<<cshields@gentoo.org></x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>

</x-tad-bigger><bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param><x-tad-bigger>Date:
</x-tad-bigger></color></bold><x-tad-bigger>Wed 14 Apr 2004 15:55:43
CEST

</x-tad-bigger><bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param><x-tad-bigger>To:
</x-tad-bigger></color></bold><x-tad-bigger>gentoo-core@lists.gentoo.org</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>

</x-tad-bigger><bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param><x-tad-bigger>Subject:
</x-tad-bigger></color><x-tad-bigger>Re: [gentoo-core] IMPORTANT:
devrel procedure (long)

</x-tad-bigger></bold>

Stewart Honsberger wrote:

<excerpt>I'm of the opinion we should forget positions, offices et al.
and remain an open, cooperative community. Allow people's strengths to
naturally take over to get problems solved.

</excerpt>

There needs to be some sort of structure in place or we will never be
seen seriously in the eyes of people who need to use it seriously.  It
is bad enough that things like "dropping you to a shell so you can fix
your shit" made it into the 2004.0 release, if everyone does whatever
they want[1], then we are setting ourselves up for a very hobbiest
distribution.  Yeah, it may already be a hobbiest distribution for
some of you, but for my employer it is a platform for our production
environment.


[1] - you're really free to do whatever you want anyway if you're
willing to put the time and effort into it, but for the core Gentoo
distribution, lines need to be drawn and enforced.


Cheers!


-Corey


-- 

Corey Shields - Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team

http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields


--

gentoo-core@gentoo.org mailing list


</excerpt>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-releng] genkernel status
  2004-04-14 14:13 [gentoo-releng] genkernel status Pieter Van den Abeele
@ 2004-04-14 14:54 ` John Davis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Davis @ 2004-04-14 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-releng; +Cc: Pieter Van den Abeele

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 597 bytes --]

On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 10:13, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Are we still going to be "dropping people to a shell so they can
> fixtheir shit" for 2004.1? Has anybody taken a look at the ppc
> initrd,which is simpler, commented and "shit"- & "idiot"- less?
> 

I am 99% sure that plasmaroo took care of it.

Talk to plasmaroo about the PPC initrd.

Cheers,
//zhen

-- 
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>

----
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338  FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-14 14:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-14 14:13 [gentoo-releng] genkernel status Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-04-14 14:54 ` John Davis

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox