From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13039 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 00:28:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 00:28:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmiUK-0002XL-5E for arch-gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:28:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 6723 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2004 00:28:06 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-releng-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-releng@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-releng@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4165 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 00:28:06 +0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rocky.richmond.edu: apache set sender to spyderous@gentoo.org using -f Message-ID: <10774.205.241.48.33.1090283266.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:27:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Donnie Berkholz" To: In-Reply-To: <200407191634.10196.jhuebel@gentoo.org> References: <200407191634.10196.jhuebel@gentoo.org> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Cc: X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MailScanner-SpamxCheck: , X-MailScanner-From: spyderous@gentoo.org X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] GRP for amd64 X-Archives-Salt: dd6c9479-8cc8-4ef0-a244-4db00e0f3175 X-Archives-Hash: 9be755591519b8e2f84c3a2f609dad84 Jason Huebel said: > So I'm in a catch 22 now. I can't figure out what's causing xfree to > merge, even with the help of wolf3102 and roger55 (thanks for the help > guys). So I figured I'd just allow it to merge and remove the binary > tarballs when it was done. But when I allow it to merge, some of the > patches are failing to apply (and thus the ebuild fails). Compound > that with the fact that either the digests for xfree 4.3.0-r6 are > screwed up in portage or the patch tarballs in spyderous' devspace have > changed. Something screwy happened here, and I've been on vacation. tseng should have fixed the problem by reverting to an older patchset version Friday, however. -- gentoo-releng@gentoo.org mailing list