From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-qa+bounces-57-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JaBIl-0002SD-6u
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:54:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CF99E0511;
	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBD8E0511
	for <gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1544552nfh.26
        for <gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.170.6 with SMTP id s6mr31086373hue.58.1205506468202;
        Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.25.3 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b41005390803140754o6b54c93bve27fa69271987170@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:54:28 -0700
From: "Alec Warner" <antarus@gentoo.org>
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] splitting up package.mask
Cc: "Steve Dibb" <beandog@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200803140651.15897.vapier@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-qa+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-qa+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-qa+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-qa.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <47D9EA1D.5070602@gentoo.org>
	 <200803140651.15897.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3bb85ce847e1be36
X-Archives-Salt: 2d1d29d4-80e3-4117-b314-f601b5ab4236
X-Archives-Hash: edaa326b260b0b77a6ae750e095a3bab

On 3/14/08, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 March 2008, Steve Dibb wrote:
>  > Because package.mask in CVS for profiles is so huge, I think it might
>  > help it to get organized if we split it up a bit.
>  >
>  > halcyon had a good idea for the scheme: testing, broken, removal.  That
>  > seems to sum up the main 3 reason that a package would be masked.
>  >
>  > Right now there are 679 entries in package.mask.  The reason I came up
>  > with the idea was to find a way to make it easier for treecleaners to
>  > quickly see which ones they were working on.
>  >
>  > I'd like to take the discussion to -dev but wanted to get QA's thoughts
>  > first.  I haven't looked into whether or not this is technically
>  > feasible at all.
>
>
> i think the real solution here is allowing masking in a package
>
> -mike
>
>

You want to add a metadata key and cache it you mean?

-Alec
-- 
gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org mailing list