From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PcNMW-0001qK-1H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:25:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B1A5E07FB for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1763FE073C for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (dynamic-adsl-94-38-245-129.clienti.tiscali.it [94.38.245.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB3161B4249 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4D2B512F.4080809@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:34:23 +0100 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101220 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA checks and reports References: <4D2B26FD.9080402@gentoo.org> <1294678105.2970.21.camel@saladin.home.flameeyes.eu> In-Reply-To: <1294678105.2970.21.camel@saladin.home.flameeyes.eu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 15c94880-9dcc-4f2c-9e5b-33d639d49bc2 X-Archives-Hash: 3b68c52d1374588ffacd7819828aeb7e On 01/10/2011 05:48 PM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > Il giorno lun, 10/01/2011 alle 16.34 +0100, Luca Barbato ha scritto: >> >> Some options are either received them as email or make it show up >> through a website (like packages.g.o)=20 >=20 > One thing I'm going to make sure here is that we _will_ have a "push" > notification; a website one has to check is _not_ going to be the only > solution; we can add as many notifications we want but at least an emai= l > has to go out. Agreed. > I for once usually don't keep many web pages open, but I always notice > email messages, and if we have a stable subject I'm going to put enough > priority on those that I can receive and act on them right as they > arrive, which is the main point of having this set up to be handled > automatically. I have serious problems with emails (I lose some when I get an overwhelming number of them in a short time due thunderbird not being able to cope with them partially) > Besides, I sincerely don't see how fate could scale well for this kind > of checks compared to the build checks ffmpeg runs. The fate structure is quite sound: - color code the situation (the bar on the top) - group the results (per arch, we could have also per herd) - give an aggregate view with ability to dig down So I'd copy it. --=20 Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero