On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
>>
>> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down
>> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think
>> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access
>> are not available fast enough.
> 
> If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without
> DevRel intervention at first.
> 
> Right now we have something along these lines:
> 
> QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the
> devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it.
> 

I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have
less people involved.

Regards,
Petteri