From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-qa+bounces-107-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OoMFt-0007Xp-DE
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:07:29 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FD57E0C01
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:07:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DCCE086E
	for <gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:20:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so648910eyf.40
        for <gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject
         :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
         :in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=bJB9cGO0an746nGpCRXgVnXfPGabHelQS9PjM8zLWs8=;
        b=SexeZiw4sstbJcD3kVyuNr7DSOZhOwR3jGbNcl6YGht0+T8IjYss844SRODvrk7X+7
         bbybp1EgXsaM9jobq6qZfDKnYaGhtDOJeWHw6vl1dDBFyZmxvQD1jkRBVnVP6GNuS01o
         xPxdl2sIlxihRj7puhA1h+n5WWNl1Uf6ZjBS8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        b=mqoxciflLDrlvsOSFRI0/16TklC4+6lFEqUcTmKPFfC0HA54iqSuTJbNV2J1d6qmRn
         Hstp9JXYgX84IhOtmh1OTWywDORvsV8xDHdgvMyxHciHo5hW/YO01u3mk6KNurKWK+4p
         ON0qCezvEokWJdewp2lOCcpa5QJhrOZEmSfDo=
Received: by 10.213.16.197 with SMTP id p5mr755455eba.59.1282764031046;
        Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mystical (62.1.250.197.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [62.1.250.197])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v59sm2618666eeh.10.2010.08.25.12.20.28
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:20:30 +0300
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA confusion: Upstream qa issues -> failing to
 install
Message-ID: <20100825192029.GA26513@Mystical>
References: <201008251342.14948.bangert@gentoo.org>
 <20100825142023.GA11809@Mystical>
 <1282751707.30896.16.camel@yamato.local>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-qa+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-qa+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-qa+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-qa.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1282751707.30896.16.camel@yamato.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Archives-Salt: e67a13b3-90fc-4f06-af3c-6333eb6ced65
X-Archives-Hash: 92b19042afde6dc7828029a838be4780


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 25/08/2010 alle 17.20 +0300, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > >  * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
> > >  *            fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
> > >  * closefromtest.c:46: warning: implicit declaration of function=20
> > > =E2=80=98closefrom=E2=80=99
> > >
> > This is a rather common bug for 64bit arches
>=20
> Actually no; the one common for 64bit arches is "implicit pointer
> conversion" warning (which may be caused by an implicit declaration,
> since implicit declarations default to int as return type!) that is
> always fatal on 64-bit (it would crash the code as the returned pointer
> would be crippled.
>=20
Diego thanks for the info. Can you please explain me why this is fatal only
with certain cflags combination? If I use -march=3Dnative -O2 -pipe the
compilation doesn't fail but if I add -ggdb -Wall the compilation fails. I
don't quite understand why so I would be grateful if you could enlighten me


--=20
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkx1bP0ACgkQ9/cejkQaxBDbFwCbBGA1UFoNKIwOaBE52UIVuiWp
+QwAn3dxFKlVvUgH/2/7yVKMcQBb6tfJ
=T3w6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--