From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OoLJH-0002Sa-N4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:06:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1A1FE0ADD for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D21E087E for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876521B4072 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:59:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA confusion: Upstream qa issues -> failing to install Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:59:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.35.2; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201008251342.14948.bangert@gentoo.org> <20100825142023.GA11809@Mystical> <1282751707.30896.16.camel@yamato.local> In-Reply-To: <1282751707.30896.16.camel@yamato.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3723413.61gFyguSoj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008251459.10970.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6012b327-7b05-4a20-b8bf-c058aa528003 X-Archives-Hash: e334be511a2231c6721b687d736a4387 --nextPart3723413.61gFyguSoj Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:55:07 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > What this bug is about is rather the kind of errors that I've commented > on in [1], [2] and [3] which is that they _may_ be related to macros or > functions that are not declared/defined by the current set of library > dependencies, and would then lead to unresolved undefined symbols, and > thus, to runtime failure. or: - the return value is larger than an "int", and thus possibly truncated - the func requires 3 args, but user passes some other number, and compile= r=20 cannot flag it - the user passes args in the incorrect order and the compiler cant check = it =2Dmike --nextPart3723413.61gFyguSoj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMdWf+AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBa1gQAJBLYapDLXQw/2IAYSC5G4+0 cfQel0yngaLGJy6ohx/enSkWOQ0AjogWRXYo9Ux9qbh2HpXa482LokNeCjo/wsEj fwUPDFAbuLFCLTYlJ5X+owktDSoebZSu4tqLy3q2gWQ+90WvPoi31IUKM4O3wvAK mCKZE34VO4xZKVSQfKbbnx+an5k/VauiSldgFl4+XkUJTXRk+lEcmGH9er4jmllx FN8Oh1p6/zbD8ztnXoVQGq4ICJPpR9u2LkHlrXxsLqO0WgZicFzi0DM50VBnsvUG IVUWsOHSnpce6eg7hZVFy+ABSX9JwnDxcqV6WHMfE+Y3BDaD67y922j7803FvHZ0 WaX+ucLATLnYHughkHAPY/xDKuZFJCV/K7eY2eRliVg9RkrzdBDXhhod7KeXoaDi wqidBj4X9Oy9VF8ckYNyt2pIoMibCgyIHJCTn5AM+vCKxpZ8TqwgZosaw6TfxyUm gX5LeaROJHwpyefN+gtCkA8OdQI9VAjbYKk4zFOSgZAizfpkl0smlyNwZapAjBu8 jBO6D0LpmDbAgtGwiJmEslpnfWnpCOfzcRvkZ2c2UQKpwfEzXeI941KeOnV70BJA 3TSZTgRx2e5IDX34Z5hpBBwEEZeyUvmdAH9UNYGDGn0feagcdbNN8vI4jGMh1gMe xAugjJ3TFCcWkjK53tqd =GFze -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3723413.61gFyguSoj--