From: Thilo Bangert <bangert@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-qa] QA confusion: Upstream qa issues -> failing to install
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:42:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008251342.14948.bangert@gentoo.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1753 bytes --]
Hi guys,
trying to install openssh on the dev profile one is greated with this
bugger:
* QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
* fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
* closefromtest.c:46: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘closefrom’
* Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA
* issues directly to the upstream developers of this software.
* Homepage: http://www.openssh.org/
* ERROR: net-misc/openssh-5.5_p1-r2 failed:
* install aborted due to poor programming practices shown above
*
* Call stack:
* misc-functions.sh, line 847: Called install_qa_check
* misc-functions.sh, line 539: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* hasq stricter ${FEATURES} && die "install
aborted due to" \
*
* If you need support, post the output of 'emerge --info =net-
misc/openssh-5.5_p1-r2',
* the complete build log and the output of 'emerge -pqv =net-
misc/openssh-5.5_p1-r2'.
* The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/net-
misc/openssh-5.5_p1-r2/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/net-
misc/openssh-5.5_p1-r2/temp/environment'.
* S: '/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/openssh-5.5_p1-r2/work/openssh-5.5p1'
This looks really really weird. On the one hand we are saying: "Its a QA
issue but upstream should fix it." followed by "It so broke, we wont let
you install it."
Perhaps qa warnings that fail when FEATURES="stricter", should not point
to upstream for the fix. Instead we should take responsibility for these
and consequently allow these bugs to linger in our bugzilla.
What do you tink?
kind regards
Thilo
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 11:42 Thilo Bangert [this message]
2010-08-25 14:20 ` [gentoo-qa] QA confusion: Upstream qa issues -> failing to install Markos Chandras
2010-08-25 15:55 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2010-08-25 18:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-25 21:57 ` Thilo Bangert
2010-08-25 19:20 ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-25 21:51 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2010-08-25 22:33 ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-25 18:27 ` Mark Loeser
2010-08-25 22:02 ` Thilo Bangert
2010-09-03 15:17 ` Mark Loeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008251342.14948.bangert@gentoo.org \
--to=bangert@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox