From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OrcUf-0003Of-8p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:04:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6A69E081D for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35ADE049A for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1742407fxm.40 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.119.210 with SMTP id a18mr302195far.52.1283540758835; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.28.64.73] (host249-252-static.95-94-b.business.telecomitalia.it [94.95.252.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4sm1073858faa.19.2010.09.03.12.05.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] From: Diego Elio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4C8125BB.6050408@gentoo.org> References: <20100821181142.GA32624@halcy0n.com> <1282420055.445.54.camel@yamato.local> <20100903151252.GE21473@halcy0n.com> <4C8125BB.6050408@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eNIvzQDpx3WBb7CxbpM1" Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:06:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1283540790.2293.51.camel@saladin.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-Archives-Salt: 78efedc2-bc23-4b50-87a3-a5fda04909cf X-Archives-Hash: e529a586a3f67ed739496a608ca5253f --=-eNIvzQDpx3WBb7CxbpM1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty ha scritto: >=20 > It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down > access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think > infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access > are not available fast enough. If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without DevRel intervention at first. Right now we have something along these lines: QA team member finds the screwup =E2=86=92 reports to QA lead =E2=86=92 ask= nicely the devrel read =E2=86=92 devrel can sit thinking about it. In the mean time, the person who was originally caught can keep committing, eventually bringing up a problem worse than the previous one, and so on so forth. What _I_ would like to see for QA? (and think others would agree) QA team member finds the screwup =E2=86=92 track down another one that agre= es on the problem being big enough =E2=86=92 they ask infra to suspend access =E2= =86=92 devrel can either negotiate for the reinstatement or proceed with retirement. --=20 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-eNIvzQDpx3WBb7CxbpM1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJMgUczAAoJEBqCrVe7WSRDriAH/2Ee7m7//szoBdZ9kn0/S544 CZekiWC+V5U/M/Z+BvhK0IR6naXDUFs5tNrL6HVH3dW0KFSbcDmx51zYbXW0PppJ YEsKqh+D/8uQYaUXnm666nGN3yfTSPgB27+NgtK29Iq//36eH+A73sc8o5JG5+P0 FzgfaCa9UGDLuRZEuPSh9uehQQj6u0m0t3+7U1CV1PP/tqtPx2KERcsHLF5ZOCTU U9/PS4lh7Xbj4K1pEAfWRtn/kSSiDe6wOKYdJ0BmjLIbbtKQkDN6ENf6FKORx6I/ qkBucVOjWQIGNhT1JTxN5Xi6znescOVrvTyfz95ujltwHV3TF2V0J0zkkcYO/dI= =WDH8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eNIvzQDpx3WBb7CxbpM1--