Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel)

[Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@gentoo.org>]

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Torsten Veller wrote:
> > * Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>:
> >> Torsten Veller wrote:
> >>> And we have a new member: christel.
> >> Actually according to convention you can't just join a project; you 
> >> usually need to ask the team and they kind of need to accept you.  So my 
> >> question is, what are your intentions for the QA project Christel?
> > 
> > Would be nice to know, but the QA GLEP says that only current lead
> > needs to approve. He did.
> > The team selects the lead at any time.
> 
> Actually if you review the alias she voted for him, so how was she
> approved prior to him being lead; if we had no lead prior to spb?

Nopes. I think you will find that with qa as many other alias a lot of
non team members are on the alias out of curiousity. qa@gentoo.org
currently has 26 developers on it, not all of which are part of the QA
team.

> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her;
> where is the mail saying so?  I'd prefer more transparency than just the
> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team.
> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd
> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at
> finding me magically added.




-- 
gentoo-qa@gentoo.org mailing list