From: "Nikolaj Sjujskij" <sterkrig@myopera.com>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>, "Mike Gilbert" <floppym@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org, python@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] [PATCH] Support overriding PYTHON_COMPAT.
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:29:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.wty2vmkrh7emz2@verkdatorn.npdb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0EP41NK=bGKPPsyFLXuMCT5_sERiAY+RexR69Z7qLvPC2vJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Den 2013-03-14 23:02:45 skrev Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:10:26 +0400
>> "Nikolaj Sjujskij" <sterkrig@myopera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Den 2013-03-13 23:49:33 skrev Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>:
>>>
>>>> It couldn't work properly, so I withdrawn it. The major problem is
>>> that
>>>> metadata becomes affected by environmental variables.
>>>>
>>>> Sadly, portage can't handle that nicely. Usually, it just results in
>>>> portage 'sticking' with one particular set of USE flags on the
>>> package
>>>> and trying to use the other one at the same time. In other words, a
>>> lot
>>>> of random behavior and QA warnings.
>>>>
>>>> Probably, the nearest thing that could work is PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE
>>>> which doesn't use the USE flags but instead forces all impls listed.
>>> I see... Well, that's unfortunate, I hoped to test pylint with it,
>>> hacking ebuild just for changing PYTHON_COMPAT isn't much fun.
>>
>> Do you consider it useful enough if PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE affected
>> the build process only? Most importantly, visible USE flags
>> and dependency resolution wouldn't be affected.
>
> That sounds good enough to me. I usually do initial testing with the
> ebuild command anyway.
That's fine for developer, who can bump ebuild afterwards, but hacking
ebuild just to report a bug and have your changes overwritten on the next
sync is a bit annoying :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-13 10:44 [gentoo-python] [PATCH] Support overriding PYTHON_COMPAT Michał Górny
2012-12-13 15:30 ` [gentoo-python] " Mike Gilbert
2012-12-13 15:51 ` Michał Górny
2012-12-13 17:50 ` [gentoo-python] [PATCH] Add docs Michał Górny
2013-03-13 9:20 ` [gentoo-python] [PATCH] Support overriding PYTHON_COMPAT Nikolaj Sjujskij
2013-03-13 19:49 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-14 13:10 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij
2013-03-14 16:15 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-14 16:41 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij
2013-03-14 19:02 ` Mike Gilbert
2013-03-15 5:29 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.wty2vmkrh7emz2@verkdatorn.npdb \
--to=sterkrig@myopera.com \
--cc=floppym@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
--cc=python@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox