From: "Nikolaj Sjujskij" <sterkrig@myopera.com>
To: "Krzysztof Pawlik" <nelchael@gentoo.org>
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>,
gentoo-python <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] python-distutils.eclass vs. python.eclass + distutils.eclass
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:36:40 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.we7zresqh7emz2@verkdatorn.npdb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC120BB.5010303@gentoo.org>
Den 2012-05-26 22:28:11 skrev Krzysztof Pawlik <nelchael@gentoo.org>:
>>>> Just yesterday I had www-servers/uwsgi recompiled because of changed
>>>> RUBY_TARGETS. And I even have no Ruby installed.
>>>
>>> I suggest you report a bug against portage and/or PMS.
>> Excuse me, but I really fail to see how this could be their fault.
>
> Yes, you do. Let me explain: there was a thread some time ago about
> portage rebuilding package when new USE flag is introduced in ebuild
> that does not change enabled USE set, that's how it's related.
All right, I get your point. But I wouldn't consider it a bug, rather a
not-so-good implementation.
In any case, it's what we have to deal for now and while Portage behaves
this way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAB_KkxwspDjWOpV7FSdwxD5MHS-qjtxrUQBiwbsc2yRhqXQntQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-26 9:32 ` [gentoo-python] python-distutils.eclass vs. python.eclass + distutils.eclass Maxim Koltsov
2012-05-26 9:53 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-05-26 13:01 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij
2012-05-26 13:07 ` Michał Górny
2012-05-26 13:09 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij
2012-05-26 18:28 ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2012-05-26 18:45 ` Maxim Koltsov
2012-05-26 19:07 ` Michał Górny
2012-06-01 10:36 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij [this message]
2012-05-26 13:33 ` Mike Gilbert
2012-06-01 12:42 ` Nikolaj Sjujskij
2012-05-26 9:53 ` Michał Górny
2012-05-26 9:55 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-05-26 10:06 ` Michał Górny
2012-05-26 18:31 ` Krzysztof Pawlik
2012-05-26 23:18 ` Mike Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.we7zresqh7emz2@verkdatorn.npdb \
--to=sterkrig@myopera.com \
--cc=gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
--cc=nelchael@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox