From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTkh-00078s-VM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:06:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2E2D21C0D8; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923FE21C0D8 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 218821B4002 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu5 with SMTP id zu5so2592197bkb.40 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:06:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.138.40 with SMTP id z40mr454662wei.26.1322834764884; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:06:04 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.104.232 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 06:05:43 -0800 (PST) From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:05:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-python] Leaving 2.4 behind To: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd966541eab604b31c78fb X-Archives-Salt: aa09b0bf-3ed6-40b6-9056-31b448fc2ba8 X-Archives-Hash: db6756f69e0e33bdba13730fca7acb26 --0016e6dd966541eab604b31c78fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi there, I feel it's about time to leave 2.4 behind. We've seen an uptick in packages that don't support it anymore (making life harder for us if we're trying to test for it), and at least some of our devs don't have it installed anymore. In the wider ecosystem, as well, it seems like other parties are also ending support for 2.4. Anyone opposed? Cheers, Dirkjan --0016e6dd966541eab604b31c78fb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there,

I feel it's about time to leave 2.4 behind. We've = seen an uptick in packages that don't support it anymore (making life h= arder for us if we're trying to test for it), and at least some of our = devs don't have it installed anymore. In the wider ecosystem, as well, = it seems like other parties are also ending support for 2.4.

Anyone opposed?

Cheers,

Dirkjan
--0016e6dd966541eab604b31c78fb--