From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-python+bounces-164-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EED138010
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:48:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61F1C21C003;
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3500021C003
for <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: djc)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A2E033D860
for <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:48:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qcpx40 with SMTP id x40so206332qcp.40
for <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.176.144 with SMTP id be16mr45518957qab.83.1348642108345;
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-python+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-python+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-python+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux <gentoo-python.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.64.98 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120926084622.46befd11@pomiocik.lan>
References: <20120925235918.3a1c7871@pomiocik.lan> <CAKmKYaDVEZcC08f1Fk5+-ThHwoS-fWkvuuhyv4KGji81jFN1UA@mail.gmail.com>
<20120926084622.46befd11@pomiocik.lan>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:48:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKmKYaDsBRa1kwCfPg544jb-TGTU7R4qQzQtpALjh_tF_8wTnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Re: USE flag dependencies on Python implementation
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org, python@gentoo.org, hasufell@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 13c73e97-4645-4ca4-b406-7311eeda0f1d
X-Archives-Hash: a22cd3337aeeb5b0b93eed42b1e3146b
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org>=
wrote:
> But then you're introducing a bunch of flags which do nothing. However,
> if you mask them in the base profile, this may actually get acceptable.
I prefer having a few few fake flags over the complexity of your proposals.
Cheers,
Dirkjan