From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOkHj-0004CN-1u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:40:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 544CDE0798; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26F8E0798 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8B9F1B402E for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so1961198wer.40 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.107.101 with SMTP id hb5mr26474941wib.7.1335768028463; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.137.162 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:40:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F9C2EA0.8000709@gentoo.org> References: <4F935B10.1030206@gentoo.org> <4F9AB7AB.3050807@gentoo.org> <4F9C2EA0.8000709@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:40:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps To: Mike Gilbert Cc: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 649210ae-7372-4a26-a0c1-0e6c5950fbc1 X-Archives-Hash: ff7bc0bca7fc82bfd7b4e4505d108d3a On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 19:53, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Per my previous message, 61 has legitimate reasons for existing. I do > not believe there is a less intrusive way to accomplish what it is > doing, and removing it would cause the behavior of wrapped python > scripts to change. Do you still want to drop it? Let's keep it. Thanks for doing all the work! Cheers, Dirkjan