From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S2edQ-0001le-3b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:11:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B310E0936; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBD9E0933; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D36E1B4012; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhi8 with SMTP id hi8so4627331wib.40 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.100.33 with SMTP id ev1mr45402652wib.3.1330503093297; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:11:33 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.82 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:11:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4D4380.9070909@gentoo.org> References: <4F4D4380.9070909@gentoo.org> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] New eclass for Python To: Krzysztof Pawlik Cc: Gentoo Dev , gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: e15c0ac7-c413-4f02-a8fd-bcba5b6ec57d X-Archives-Hash: b116b84d552d173e21ac0e0b6fec7e6d On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 22:13, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote: > If there are no objections then during the weekend (March 3, 4) I will add this > to portage (after finishing remaining TODO items, PyPy requires 4G of RAM(!!)). Can we perhaps just name it python-r2 rather than python-distutils-ng? Seems descriptive enough... Cheers, Dirkjan