From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F070413800E for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B6B4E0330; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177EAE0330 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djc) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51F271B4008 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3699466wgb.10 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.101.102 with SMTP id ff6mr237072wib.0.1343639371900; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.162.209 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:09:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120730110654.1567cf84@pomiocik.lan> References: <5015EDC2.202@gentoo.org> <50164471.9080108@gentoo.org> <20120730110654.1567cf84@pomiocik.lan> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Python 3 in Gentoo To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: Richard Yao , gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 231aa26d-8957-4c3e-87d9-f2014563b1ab X-Archives-Hash: d1a400fb559e1f45b6fa9b0ffcb2fe46 On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> Well, maybe we should explore that option. It would seem to solve a >> real problem that doesn't just apply to python. For example, the SLOT >> value could be prefixed with something to indicate that it should not >> be selected for upgrades automatically (i.e. other slots should be >> preferred). > > [facepalm] Well, thanks for your constructive participation in this discussion. > Or maybe we should explore the option of fixing python.eclass to not > depend on random python versions implicitly? I don't know that it does, but I hope you can enlighten me! Cheers, Dirkjan