public inbox for gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-python <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>,
	"Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Reducing exceptionality cases for PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:26:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP42d69xgBuH-MewoUq1eWjNYAE898K8MGtxeBwAVO26dsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141030204318.63f8d104@pomiot.lan>

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Dnia 2014-10-30, o godz. 15:21:17
> Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>
>> After discussion and review by mgorny, and significantly more testing,
>> here's an updated version of the previous patch.
>>
>> To reiterate, this patch changes python-single-r1 so that if there is
>> only one supported Python implementation that can satisfy the ebuild,
>> then PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET is ignored, and the ebuild is bound by the
>> value(s) set in PYTHON_TARGETS instead.
>
> It is not ignored but not declared, which is good. Ignoring is bad :).
>
> So I was pretty skeptic about this at first but after thinking it all
> over a few times, I think it will work just fine. While it benefits
> only the 'bad' kind of packages and adds some complexity, I believe
> this is a worthwhile change.

I guess I'm still a little skeptical.

What is the advantage to making such a change to python-single-r1 as
opposed to just using python-r1 with a single implementation in
PYTHON_COMPAT?


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-30 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-29 18:17 [gentoo-python] Reducing exceptionality cases for PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET Ian Stakenvicius
2014-10-29 18:25 ` W. Trevor King
2014-10-29 18:40   ` Ian Stakenvicius
     [not found]   ` <5451330B.7000705@gentoo.org>
     [not found]     ` <20141029184254.GI15443@odin.tremily.us>
2014-10-29 18:47       ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-10-29 18:31 ` Michał Górny
2014-10-29 18:39   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-10-29 20:09     ` Michał Górny
2014-10-29 20:21       ` Mike Gilbert
2014-10-29 20:25         ` Michał Górny
2014-10-30 19:21           ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-10-30 19:43             ` Michał Górny
2014-10-30 20:26               ` Mike Gilbert [this message]
2014-10-30 21:31                 ` Michał Górny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ0EP42d69xgBuH-MewoUq1eWjNYAE898K8MGtxeBwAVO26dsA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=floppym@gentoo.org \
    --cc=axs@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox