From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BEA1389E2 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B404DE0AEF; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A9BE0AEF for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5488D33BE19 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z20so4030798igj.10 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:49:13 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.22.72 with SMTP id b8mr11187847igf.1.1418262553689; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:49:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.111.132 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:49:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:49:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs From: Mike Gilbert To: Dirkjan Ochtman Cc: gentoo-python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 33736d81-9862-481a-864b-cfe5bcc8010c X-Archives-Hash: bb1a8555618e16a34e0a640ac390f2a9 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> dev-python/pathlib >>> dev-python/pyutil >>> dev-python/zbase32 >>> dev-python/zfec >> >> Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes >> on the first one, not sure about context on the rest. >> > > Agreed on pathlib. > > The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs. > I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree > uses these. Actually, pathlib seems to be unused in the tree. I think we could lastrite it.