From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABF4138010 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 02:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE050E0138; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 02:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064F2E0138 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 02:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1331333D77B for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 02:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so766614wib.10 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.97 with SMTP id r75mr4158277wei.127.1346379205205; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.2.131 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:13:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5015EDC2.202@gentoo.org> <50295078.7030104@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:13:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Python 3 in Gentoo From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: c6430971-9e9d-4305-a0c1-8fd88edf3736 X-Archives-Hash: 927b7752b88c24a723ac46529cbcd568 On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Richard Yao wrote: >>> Does this seem like a viable option? Is anyone going to volunteer to >>> take it from here? >> >> I can try to make time to make these changes this weekend if everyone is >> fine with that. > > I think we should inform gentoo-dev first. > Just in case someone is waiting for me to take some further actions on this, please don't wait on me. I really don't have the motivation to carry this plan any further. If someone else wants to carry the torch, I am happy to assist.