* [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs [not found] <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org> @ 2014-12-10 13:17 ` Dirkjan Ochtman 2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2014-12-10 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-python On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote: > dev-python/pathlib > dev-python/pyutil > dev-python/zbase32 > dev-python/zfec Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes on the first one, not sure about context on the rest. Cheers, Dirkjan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs 2014-12-10 13:17 ` [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert 2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Gilbert @ 2014-12-11 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw To: Dirkjan Ochtman; +Cc: gentoo-python On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote: >> dev-python/pathlib >> dev-python/pyutil >> dev-python/zbase32 >> dev-python/zfec > > Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes > on the first one, not sure about context on the rest. > Agreed on pathlib. The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs. I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree uses these. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs 2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert @ 2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert 2014-12-11 8:30 ` Dirkjan Ochtman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Gilbert @ 2014-12-11 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw To: Dirkjan Ochtman; +Cc: gentoo-python On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> dev-python/pathlib >>> dev-python/pyutil >>> dev-python/zbase32 >>> dev-python/zfec >> >> Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes >> on the first one, not sure about context on the rest. >> > > Agreed on pathlib. > > The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs. > I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree > uses these. Actually, pathlib seems to be unused in the tree. I think we could lastrite it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs 2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert @ 2014-12-11 8:30 ` Dirkjan Ochtman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2014-12-11 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw To: Mike Gilbert; +Cc: gentoo-python On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote: > Actually, pathlib seems to be unused in the tree. I think we could lastrite it. pathlib is in the 3.4 stdlib, so I don't think we should lastrite it. Cheers, Dirkjan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-11 8:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org>
2014-12-10 13:17 ` [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Dirkjan Ochtman
2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert
2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert
2014-12-11 8:30 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox