From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-python+bounces-648-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896911389E2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77FEEE0AB0;
	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:46:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ABF8E0AB0
	for <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:46:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 101DC33DF72
	for <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:46:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id rd18so3914205iec.22
        for <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-python+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-python+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-python+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux <gentoo-python.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.194.17 with SMTP id dw17mr9461788icb.4.1418262406214;
 Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.111.132 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:46:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKmKYaDZB1=gh21NB4rvHq0cMf7jU0TfCEgVaFL1n74MBWK3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org>
	<CAKmKYaDZB1=gh21NB4rvHq0cMf7jU0TfCEgVaFL1n74MBWK3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:46:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41ncrbpdng07K1Bwtu8pioRUO1W0fikWOkUXiU9NF7VQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-python <gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 3c1a73c0-753f-478e-aedc-53b57a1e727e
X-Archives-Hash: dff7f683e9d0e318f4c183879dc6ce84

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> dev-python/pathlib
>> dev-python/pyutil
>> dev-python/zbase32
>> dev-python/zfec
>
> Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes
> on the first one, not sure about context on the rest.
>

Agreed on pathlib.

The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs.
I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree
uses these.