* [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
[not found] <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org>
@ 2014-12-10 13:17 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2014-12-10 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-python
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> dev-python/pathlib
> dev-python/pyutil
> dev-python/zbase32
> dev-python/zfec
Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes
on the first one, not sure about context on the rest.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
2014-12-10 13:17 ` [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert
2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2014-12-11 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dirkjan Ochtman; +Cc: gentoo-python
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> dev-python/pathlib
>> dev-python/pyutil
>> dev-python/zbase32
>> dev-python/zfec
>
> Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes
> on the first one, not sure about context on the rest.
>
Agreed on pathlib.
The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs.
I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree
uses these.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert
@ 2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert
2014-12-11 8:30 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2014-12-11 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dirkjan Ochtman; +Cc: gentoo-python
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> dev-python/pathlib
>>> dev-python/pyutil
>>> dev-python/zbase32
>>> dev-python/zfec
>>
>> Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes
>> on the first one, not sure about context on the rest.
>>
>
> Agreed on pathlib.
>
> The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs.
> I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree
> uses these.
Actually, pathlib seems to be unused in the tree. I think we could lastrite it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert
@ 2014-12-11 8:30 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2014-12-11 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Mike Gilbert; +Cc: gentoo-python
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Actually, pathlib seems to be unused in the tree. I think we could lastrite it.
pathlib is in the 3.4 stdlib, so I don't think we should lastrite it.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-11 8:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org>
2014-12-10 13:17 ` [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Dirkjan Ochtman
2014-12-11 1:46 ` Mike Gilbert
2014-12-11 1:49 ` Mike Gilbert
2014-12-11 8:30 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox