From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOBq2-00056A-TS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:53:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9B9CE0790; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1E6E0790 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (d14-69-47-19.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.19.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04C481B404F; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F9C2EA0.8000709@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:53:36 -0400 From: Mike Gilbert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120422 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djc@gentoo.org CC: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps References: <4F935B10.1030206@gentoo.org> <4F9AB7AB.3050807@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF08017693157D76D0AF7A236" X-Archives-Salt: f355c5f5-b869-4c80-835f-e85d9ebfb6c3 X-Archives-Hash: 76d4c61de0d85a5dbc7d1f41d4de974b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF08017693157D76D0AF7A236 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:13, Mike Gilbert wrote:= >> Would you like me to cut a new set of tarballs without 08, 22, and 23?= >=20 > That would be perfect. I'd also still like to drop 61 unless we have a > clear picture of what/why it helps (and can document that in the > patch). >=20 I have uploaded new tarballs to my devspace. http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/python/python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3-1.tar.b= z2 http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/python/python-gentoo-patches-3.2.3-1.tar.b= z2 I removed only 08, 22, and 23. Per my previous message, 61 has legitimate reasons for existing. I do not believe there is a less intrusive way to accomplish what it is doing, and removing it would cause the behavior of wrapped python scripts to change. Do you still want to drop it? --------------enigF08017693157D76D0AF7A236 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk+cLqAACgkQC77qH+pIQ6RSrQD/RWkWy+zVGPwOMW9r4rfeAOIf NMOaB6yusyT5pSgDSdcBAJBwkkJARSKJAL39y2dki92R5mNulRy0vb3PhXIHhtuf =0j6S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF08017693157D76D0AF7A236--