From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNouY-0005SN-Hq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:24:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77423E06EE; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42649E06EE for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (d14-69-47-19.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.19.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C6FD1B4013; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F9AD65B.3090903@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:24:43 -0400 From: Mike Gilbert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120422 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djc@gentoo.org CC: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps References: <4F935B10.1030206@gentoo.org> <4F9AB7AB.3050807@gentoo.org> <4F9AD4C5.6060701@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4F9AD4C5.6060701@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2DBC887BD0F4C5A428D98C23" X-Archives-Salt: deb76346-ed4a-4af3-bb8c-4c96ad16d52e X-Archives-Hash: 6620fb20eaf503e1bf4519929a7fef77 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2DBC887BD0F4C5A428D98C23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/27/2012 01:17 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>> 3. Added 61_all_process_data.patch, for which the goal seems somewha= t unclear. >>> This is some logic for python-wrapper that was in the 2.7.2 patchset = as >>> well. If you want to drop it, I'm sure that will require some >>> re-engineering of python-wrapper. >> >> Right. Do you know what this fixes, and how/why it will be >> re-engineered? As long as we don't know these things, I'd prefer to >> leave the patch out rather than include it. >> >=20 > I have been bitten in the past by removing things that I don't fully > understand, so I'm trying to avoid doing that. I guess I can drop it an= d > see what happens. >=20 I will add investigating this patch to my todo list. Hopefully Arfrever can explain the rationale to me, and I can relay that. Otherwise, I will have to figure it out the hard way. --------------enig2DBC887BD0F4C5A428D98C23 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk+a1lsACgkQC77qH+pIQ6RobwD5AVzjL+J7cspVNZ9ZNdVUiuQc Z6+Ih7rtOnZaISMNbEQA/Ry9ODU3DBOnVuvjPj0LqQrdndEDb3Gs1FX4egI5REZF =xUrZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2DBC887BD0F4C5A428D98C23--