From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNoo5-0004cJ-C6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0CCDE072D; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1FBE072D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (d14-69-47-19.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.19.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA95F1B4013; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F9AD4C5.6060701@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:17:57 -0400 From: Mike Gilbert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120422 Thunderbird/11.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djc@gentoo.org CC: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Testing dev-lang/python version bumps References: <4F935B10.1030206@gentoo.org> <4F9AB7AB.3050807@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig006EA9D054FF9E9C45498C41" X-Archives-Salt: f59d2e73-b364-423c-b101-bbb84b3cde72 X-Archives-Hash: 1322e01add2e3c4b577afb0c27ad005f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig006EA9D054FF9E9C45498C41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> 3. Added 61_all_process_data.patch, for which the goal seems somewhat= unclear. >> This is some logic for python-wrapper that was in the 2.7.2 patchset a= s >> well. If you want to drop it, I'm sure that will require some >> re-engineering of python-wrapper. >=20 > Right. Do you know what this fixes, and how/why it will be > re-engineered? As long as we don't know these things, I'd prefer to > leave the patch out rather than include it. >=20 I have been bitten in the past by removing things that I don't fully understand, so I'm trying to avoid doing that. I guess I can drop it and see what happens. >>> You also removed the mention of the upstream bug from >>> 04_all_libdir.patch, probably just by mistake? >> >> I don't see any mention of a bug in the 2.7.2, 2.7.3 or 2.7.3-0 versio= n >> of the patch, so I'm not sure what you are referring to here. >=20 > Are you sure? The 04* patch I just unpacked from my 2.7.3 patch set > does have a bug in it (maybe it wasn't in 2.7.2, though). > The words "bug" and "issue" do not appear in 04_all_libdir.patch from the copy of python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3.tar.bz2 that I just downloaded from distfiles.gentoo.org. I also checked the copy in distfiles-local on dev.gentoo.org. I think you may be working with a different tarball, or I'm missing something really obvious. --------------enig006EA9D054FF9E9C45498C41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk+a1MUACgkQC77qH+pIQ6RidAD+OiaEn7l4PggpKzaOLuOd1YUN pVZyt4PsvggSdowUv4oA/R28XqTFrTsp9WDAXbrDBJqB5PKOxSyOHZ5HNUe7zgmM =g8c7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig006EA9D054FF9E9C45498C41--