From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RWfYX-0004pm-6J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:42:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FC7D21C036; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE9021C036 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (d14-69-47-19.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.19.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B584B1B400B for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4ED98C82.8090900@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:42:10 -0500 From: Mike Gilbert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111116 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Leaving 2.4 behind References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8EE0427BB308A0F1C0FF0F70" X-Archives-Salt: 0e99a9a3-0f4c-48e7-8a46-f6b7dd534492 X-Archives-Hash: 4e88182e54552335f2decaa5e916ce79 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8EE0427BB308A0F1C0FF0F70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/02/2011 09:05 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > I feel it's about time to leave 2.4 behind. We've seen an uptick in > packages that don't support it anymore (making life harder for us if > we're trying to test for it), and at least some of our devs don't have > it installed anymore. In the wider ecosystem, as well, it seems like > other parties are also ending support for 2.4. >=20 > Anyone opposed? No disagreement here. --------------enig8EE0427BB308A0F1C0FF0F70 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk7ZjIcACgkQC77qH+pIQ6QZtwD/dSNrXlvJIGSpDOkpD02zzYeh 5vESLpNlCUv+ac5YND8A/1J1emAK6TrRO22gBYBOVOVDhmQi4zOWq148wgBA/Dgo =QOh0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8EE0427BB308A0F1C0FF0F70--