Dnia 2013-09-14, o godz. 19:33:04
Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Dnia 2013-09-14, o godz. 18:16:33
> > Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> > The sub-roots are no longer necessary since we're installing scripts to
> >> > per-impl directories initially.
> >> > ---
> >> >  gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 9 +++------
> >> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
> >> > index 7102c58..5fcb55e 100644
> >> > --- a/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
> >> > +++ b/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
> >> > @@ -476,9 +476,7 @@ distutils-r1_python_install() {
> >> >         addpredict "$(python_get_sitedir)"
> >> >         addpredict /usr/lib/portage/pym
> >> >
> >> > -       local root=${D}/_${EPYTHON}
> >> > -       [[ ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]] && root=${D}
> >> > -       flags+=( --root="${root}" )
> >> > +       flags+=( --root="${D}" )
> >> >
> >> >         if [[ ! ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then
> >> >                 local PYTHON_SCRIPTDIR
> >> > @@ -488,13 +486,12 @@ distutils-r1_python_install() {
> >> >
> >> >         esetup.py install "${flags[@]}" "${@}"
> >> >
> >> > -       if [[ -d ${root}$(python_get_sitedir)/tests ]]; then
> >> > +       if [[ -d ${D}$(python_get_sitedir)/tests ]]; then
> >> >                 die "Package installs 'tests' package, file collisions likely."
> >> >         fi
> >> >
> >> >         if [[ ! ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then
> >> > -               _distutils-r1_wrap_scripts "${root}"
> >> > -               multibuild_merge_root "${root}" "${D}"
> >> > +               _distutils-r1_wrap_scripts "${D}"
> >> >         fi
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 1.8.3.2
> >> >
> >>
> >> I believe this patch causes a race condition which causes
> >> java-config's ebuild to fail.
> >>
> >> running install_data
> >> running install_egg_info
> >> Writing /tmp/portage/dev-java/java-config-2.2.0/image/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/java_config-
> >> 2.2.0-py2.7.egg-info
> >> error: /tmp/portage/dev-java/java-config-2.2.0/image//usr/share/java-config-2/config/:
> >> File exists
> >
> > I love when people hack build systems and have no idea about writing
> > build systems...
> >
> > What are you suggesting? Finding all the broken stuff and fixing it, or
> > restoring sub-roots?
> 
> This is a well-used package which will be broken if we apply this
> patch. I'm not sure we can reliably identify this kind of problem, and
> fixing individual packages would be a bit of work in any case..
> Keeping the sub-roots code in place seems like the safer course of
> action here.

You're right. Replaced 5-8 with two smaller patches and submitted
in a new sub-thread here. You can also find it in -r4 branch.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny