From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B0F138AEE for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BD05E03E0; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7957E03E0 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [213.195.173.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13F9F33DD40; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:13:59 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Mike Gilbert Cc: gentoo-python Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Binhost for pypy Message-ID: <20130218221359.5fe89468@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20130218204431.1d061fa6@pomiocik.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.15; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/FynkGxG9/UJ9IaS0wNebwVD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 269dea42-3489-4656-92fe-217e8945c5db X-Archives-Hash: 2eaac635827b5c33858e25593172b0d0 --Sig_/FynkGxG9/UJ9IaS0wNebwVD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:51:40 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:09:40 -0500 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > >> I set up a mini-binhost in my devspace so that people can more easily > >> install pypy on lower-end hardware. > >> > >> Add one the following to your PORTAGE_BINHOST depending on your arch. > >> > >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/pypy/amd64/ > >> http://dev.gentoo.ogr/~floppym/pypy/x86/ > > > > Did you mean: ogre? > > > >> You should then be able to install pypy with emerge -g. > > > > Hmm, if you have both amd64 & x86, I think we should really consider > > deploying pypy-bin. > > >=20 > Adding a separate pypy-bin package means we have to mess with the > eclasses to get the deps right. With python-r1 it should be quite simple. Does PMS permit things like: || ( a b || ( c d ) e ) ? AFAICS it doesn't prohibit it, saying that || () takes 'dependency atoms of any type'. > Also I have no idea how we would deal with PYTHON_REQ_USE. Maybe > use.force to implement fake use flags on pypy-bin? Yes, use.force is a good idea indeed. Or a virtual :P. > Overall, just reusing binpkgs seems simpler. For you, not for users :P. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/FynkGxG9/UJ9IaS0wNebwVD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlEimZkACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0jswP/TnCxQqFSkbsVke+3f0HUoVBA uvXWpl+zgK2UJVD+gNN11D25cbJvW9kgrJ/cVhzQ0+gPofly5yeBd/NWFYPd3YCE yDSEPGXav2JIr21KToudcMrS8kBpVZP6lC7e/enMEcud+MMbCVeMwxuJODjsptZe GBOqlAlbAPuRf87OjWY= =gw3d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FynkGxG9/UJ9IaS0wNebwVD--