From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB51C1386B7 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ECB9E0539; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C2AE0539 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (159-205-85-177.adsl.inetia.pl [159.205.85.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F7BA33DAC2; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:08:28 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Mike Gilbert Cc: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org, python@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [PATCH] Introduce run_in_build_dir() as requested in a few ebuilds. Message-ID: <20130126180828.00795548@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <1359199681-31420-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/_ZGZckk5rnA+rO3UJDm+iDJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 22eaf10d-732a-44b5-974f-305e3382922d X-Archives-Hash: 8cbab5b95d212454af919867888583a6 --Sig_/_ZGZckk5rnA+rO3UJDm+iDJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:43:13 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > Maybe this should be prefixed with "python_" so as not to clobber the > same function which may be added to some other eclass? I was wondering about the same thing but supposedly the same function in some other eclass should do the same ;). --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/_ZGZckk5rnA+rO3UJDm+iDJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlEEDYwACgkQfXuS5UK5QB31mwP/U/gXY+2pIPUN/N08nRTCIh3Y rBygydGv+2sG4hhGQVosALEgTxOkNB+M9+1JlS5S7SnttNq/qpM+hTIR+V1LdmfW SAUiO7yF9OsQy2i42HsppUhXiD6lNMIToIRj8T+A/bmz8aQX+gU3cvZM6huFtX77 girwau9MZ3CbxDt3jQc= =FGo1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_ZGZckk5rnA+rO3UJDm+iDJ--