From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C53D13800E for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66CCCE04C8; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD4DE04C8 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-56-136.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.56.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BBC01B4008; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:16:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Dirkjan Ochtman Cc: Richard Yao , gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Python 3 in Gentoo Message-ID: <20120730111657.723dd344@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <5015EDC2.202@gentoo.org> <50164471.9080108@gentoo.org> <20120730110654.1567cf84@pomiocik.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/T3QJFdAKnU.RawbxK1/Pg2C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9caa28f0-9deb-48fc-ab0b-50ba5adfcc4f X-Archives-Hash: 971f2248af595af5ad9bc6e73754d1a7 --Sig_/T3QJFdAKnU.RawbxK1/Pg2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:09:11 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny > wrote: > >> Well, maybe we should explore that option. It would seem to solve a > >> real problem that doesn't just apply to python. For example, the > >> SLOT value could be prefixed with something to indicate that it > >> should not be selected for upgrades automatically (i.e. other > >> slots should be preferred). > > > > [facepalm] >=20 > Well, thanks for your constructive participation in this discussion. You're saying 'we should explore the option not to upgrade packages without user explicitly saying "please upgrade this package"'. > > Or maybe we should explore the option of fixing python.eclass to not > > depend on random python versions implicitly? >=20 > I don't know that it does, but I hope you can enlighten me! It does depend on python versions based on $USE_PYTHON. And USE_PYTHON defaults to 2+3 if installed. If it pulls in Python 3, it will pull in all the time unless you set USE_PYTHON manually and remerge all the packages manually. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/T3QJFdAKnU.RawbxK1/Pg2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlAWUQoACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3iDAQAmc9PAcQ3ls/KMT0pL1bDV7Fc n5j+lzyabEJl2pnjs+Ltvu8/xMiP3hhmk/8FhYQwm2S/WaZC5f2l1GPt/fpxCUfv Yq3D/D2JhY7/IhDz0roT8ZLfFe00VXQ3CdvOmhf6ZEdag6jsuGM4+ag06ZtvFnBV UPm9vZYoZkyGGP7qgh4= =/ozY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/T3QJFdAKnU.RawbxK1/Pg2C--