From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SYGia-00008u-R6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 13:07:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 207B8E062B; Sat, 26 May 2012 13:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22A9E062B for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 13:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-57-114.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.57.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE7711B4006; Sat, 26 May 2012 13:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 15:07:29 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: "Nikolaj Sjujskij" Cc: gentoo-python , "Dirkjan Ochtman" Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] python-distutils.eclass vs. python.eclass + distutils.eclass Message-ID: <20120526150729.033dcd82@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussions centering around the Python ecosystem in Gentoo Linux X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-python@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/yc41Si4FsP4eeK4HbJtJYjV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 509d75cb-e39c-490a-a4f5-e9de561148f7 X-Archives-Hash: 3ce097d7867ff68d50b1f00ee1dc511f --Sig_/yc41Si4FsP4eeK4HbJtJYjV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:01:26 +0400 "Nikolaj Sjujskij" wrote: > > So I think the second part of this (x.y to x.y+1 transitions, in the > > Python world, are generally relatively smooth) invalidates your > > point in the first part: if the transitions are generally smooth, > > then yes, when Python 3.3 gets stabilized, I want all of my Python > > packages to be available from the 3.3 interpreter. > Let's take a "stable" user who updates (`emerge --update --deep > --newuse @world`) his/her system regularly. > Python 3.3 is released, added to Portage tree and eventually unmasked. > PYTHON_TARGETS variable is changed to include 3.3. And suddenly > `emerge --newuse @world` on stable system suggests rebuilding of > every package using new eclass, because new (though disabled) > USE-flags was added. And when Python 3.3 is keyworded stable, hence > bringing new default PYTHON_TARGETS, user should now rebuild those > packages once more, but now, at least, not uselessly. >=20 > Just yesterday I had www-servers/uwsgi recompiled because of changed =20 > RUBY_TARGETS. And I even have no Ruby installed. I suggest you report a bug against portage and/or PMS. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/yc41Si4FsP4eeK4HbJtJYjV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk/A1ZEACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1nSQP5AW8ylqobSaG1hwV3zO+pXceL i7rxvXn+ck8PWW2Wa84zSibGIpUmDQbEfYRvcuTLM9xZjaBtRmm7smCz48+e+D01 N9/uBvdrv+Bm7enpEcPwJVpxBjG3lRz+BzGyhqA2sEo8bSHbO1bIqPkGSHjhMtzJ CxdPSpOWuOHpoIGvTNk= =6mLk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/yc41Si4FsP4eeK4HbJtJYjV--