From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36568139694 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 05:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EDF4E0C64; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 05:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151F4E0C64 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 05:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.6.88] ([212.159.46.162]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102 [212.227.15.179]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1Fnc-1dsAL82G6a-00t8bR for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 07:29:18 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] [RFC] New doc & policy To: gentoo-proxy-maint@lists.gentoo.org References: <1500537721.746.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1500584775.746.11.camel@gentoo.org> From: "M. J. Everitt" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 06:29:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Proxy Maintainers X-BeenThere: gentoo-proxy-maint@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-proxy-maint@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1500584775.746.11.camel@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QxLdj23Btg9WGXv5xuTqOpVWD9bTVWUx2" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UB7X5/HH5TovZpYsrMvfpPEqY49yEfXJ+hGHnHkvoCP7JxaxgCI Y9afWDEgDrNFKKLSuS219BQY+/ry3ed1tSQdYyNWBDBE/3AEHkTVsCea8sck8BEukDqtYSm gaxZlEAmK3KbyCFG9duYdmt1CIIp0v/CdNcgq2XaR5R5vUABglN0yNJ44grioW8oE+cW/ZG m9MmDHPNYmdcqjcRYkm6Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:CKQwwwopluU=:eQsjshsdcHrPAn/TOP3j7R jSFfUlpEj1f4in9+IKn/WVytuFM9/uSApKbir2YnmKgDR4x4jFeLnnaGWVJfosyPsTCF7ZvdO qjxUOrMlGOIEl6aur1WpKpOiow5vdlcziAeNIEcYj2LkaqdxinDBZ9IWpiA+xYWF5ToU33Lp0 4MO88wY06teS2HkJ8pMqpRBdRExEIcbT5DSiRHZoKlnL1u1b5h1wQm1agsToaABDle8SJOW1k S+8/T9TAlWZkamkLx/ueysYAZk5e9Ux1gVwJDLYcbvMBlEpdVgeV9/32nNltxTTtvKryt1UZ3 EZ8yquF+WXT2OwpWSlFhT6Q2N9jdl9KaND1nAf3LH0N3rujh9iRGTbgAEQk2g8Rhj+VWZRjLD 3fad8m+VeIF8XdU6vLT6Lrs3XZHrXlo3cFNWmXzJmbjmhKQDgoEAhpKoRDV28YMTo/DhC0xKA 53AE9nJpwwQD2VV6G6aCctnpP7FeCK6VMvunICsEhhVh1n7OBLGjYUqqfxgPZyJciXMH9YPVa /syMRkRVZruztNd+OBezxFPJyItK8KZac6+7Lf8bgzoiaqYCkDMBNRgZsiidIUJcTfuDgM698 QgEek+bQ+ekMoEWtd6wuBQHkM5FqU3w8xtNOQOtz7bzTVLVpnUm44xpw6p6IFPkiBJWx14+y1 4bsjuQ+Fc3YNAPM6v1fOxE38ldyUJLjbxTWsoooojiYTujnHzR209VqY78o/zYYkM6TlsSEvz umugjzfiH5rRRduj1b+NjW+LdyvXmEuKrcVmsg== X-Archives-Salt: 48d46f33-eb67-457d-93c2-47c25d885607 X-Archives-Hash: ae1145e0998d69d3bae40323e313c3de This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --QxLdj23Btg9WGXv5xuTqOpVWD9bTVWUx2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8TgGD5PK9TX4nfM9XM2HbcXq55oBiIbDo"; protected-headers="v1" From: "M. J. Everitt" To: gentoo-proxy-maint@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] [RFC] New doc & policy References: <1500537721.746.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1500584775.746.11.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1500584775.746.11.camel@gentoo.org> --8TgGD5PK9TX4nfM9XM2HbcXq55oBiIbDo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 20/07/17 22:06, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Here's v2, taking into account suggestions from k_f and wraeth: > > =3D=3DPrivileges and responsibilities of proxied maintainers=3D=3D > What you get as a proxied maintainer: > * ability to maintain ebuilds directly in the Gentoo repository for all= > our users to use; > * coverage from our teams: QA, security; > * coverage by package-oriented services: [http://euscan.gentooexperimen= t > al.org euscan], [https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ qa-reports], > [https://repology.org/ repology]; > * ability to request keywording on additional architectures (but note > that most of arch teams are against proactive keywording) and to reques= t > stabilization; It's a subtle point, but it's one I think that can be fixed with a wording tweak - I get wraeth's point about users requesting stabilisation of a package, which is quite true .. so I think the wording of the final point here might be better as something like "... to request stabilisation of a package by the Arch Teams" or such. After all, we're basically talking about the correct authority to CC the arch teams on the stabilisation bugs, vs filing a stabilisation bug, right? [which also might warrant mentioning/clarifying at another stage].= It's a minor point, but may be clearer exactly what's being indicated, rather than creating confusion or misinterpretation. HTH, MJE --8TgGD5PK9TX4nfM9XM2HbcXq55oBiIbDo-- --QxLdj23Btg9WGXv5xuTqOpVWD9bTVWUx2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJIBAEBCAAyFiEERR5DB4J2baXtk4AVu81GK0wzHTUFAllxkSwUHG0uai5ldmVy aXR0QGllZS5vcmcACgkQu81GK0wzHTV7GQ//aYC+0d2vCiWHPnDOASGl///a3QQ6 +/DXTR05MvPf6CYNHhOZxNcTv5ReL0wj1qtzJ659J6Rkr7DfX0mPUVqgyybujtEM hqKJr+UqDAuvjap18YMa1AVVvNAuXIirTIGag5v3fuP4r00DCB4kjCsBhJL4QGK3 opNBdDDz/2vJSPyI7jKwGL9pb71FJXL7XLf+Ws9uVII4XvUJ0nk/3ByyRGtd8Os/ PsqQDZDH2QTMd6EswKXlitCxk3Gxk3B7Hbrj0D1Z66z2byu9Jvov5br3Pnb03YEu zWxa+mE18aqyMj5fD2V/xBt2NeEZrs7Ge5OtH6hiUgRIaTyNuAZ4DGP+r5iBM4/D Dge/4V3HOGMcOHww59z0nI0AnVP4D2T+yilXIz4XAug+qAtmsEoXhWXoY9MZdmxj 6q9/tRUjAfaM6Y+nBVR56fjhrol5H6sXWYqhELThd8F6Bt6Mmvmjlu0AG185WdF2 GOUIC5gkzb/DY7ssw0kAmQ/k54f7AVc2J8A/iKeyC3J6jd+8YBHoFOG7E/v/zmPC mv3oEDxlxKGIXkzRPMFg9/+5yULTdX52X3+XvXh/oJhIMJbTb2QT/t85d77vpPlP ihsT5AUz/k+CL2/fITVGRCHnfBhsUVPZJWyBjn8lro4ZER+1uCldPxDq42Sc3PP2 Xc77oTS5kiKxFfE= =YsYV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QxLdj23Btg9WGXv5xuTqOpVWD9bTVWUx2--