On 06/30/2016 10:12 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
On 06/30/2016 04:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/30/2016 10:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/30/2016 09:52 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
On 06/30/2016 03:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/30/2016 09:39 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
On 30.06.2016 02:06, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/30/2016 02:05 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
Hi,
I have to go to a work meeting, so I'll read the summary later, ubt the
only two points that were agreed upon were that it should show the
election date and that the council should ask them to *consider*
electing a lead. Not force them to do so.
Thats a nice way of saying please do so :) The actual email that went
out is
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/0ddae87c0b9c1fcc488063ea6b3370c5
he Council would like to encourage all projects to record who the leads
are and when the last election took place on the project pages of the
wiki. Having said that, the council understands that not all projects
strictly adhere to GLEP 39: they either operate without a lead or they
don't hold regular elections. If this is working for a project, then it
which recognizes the GLEP requirement, however, there won't be any
direct sanction for not having one in
the general case.
is not our purpose to tell you to change your practice. However, if a
project does have a lead and elections are regularly held, please note
that on the project home page. We're hoping to track the leads so that
we have a point of contact for each project.
Proxy maint is coordination point between multiple groups in the
community and certainly should adhere to GLEP 39.