Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] Proxy Maintainers lead election: Call for nomination

[NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2254 bytes --]

On June 30, 2016 4:19:07 PM EDT, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@gentoo.org> wrote:
>On 06/30/2016 10:12 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>> On 06/30/2016 04:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 06/30/2016 10:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>> On 06/30/2016 09:52 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>>>>> On 06/30/2016 03:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/30/2016 09:39 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30.06.2016 02:06, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06/30/2016 02:05 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>>>
>> I have to go to a work meeting, so I'll read the summary later, ubt
>the
>> only two points that were agreed upon were that it should show the
>> election date and that the council should ask them to *consider*
>> electing a lead.  Not force them to do so.
>> 
>
>Thats a nice way of saying please do so :) The actual email that went
>out is
>https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/0ddae87c0b9c1fcc488063ea6b3370c5
>
>> he Council would like to encourage all projects to record who the
>leads 
>> are and when the last election took place on the project pages of the
>
>> wiki.  Having said that, the council understands that not all
>projects 
>> strictly adhere to GLEP 39: they either operate without a lead or
>they 
>> don't hold regular elections.  If this is working for a project, then
>it
>
>which recognizes the GLEP requirement, however, there won't be any
>direct sanction for not having one in the general case.
>
>> is not our purpose to tell you to change your practice.  However, if
>a 
>> project does have a lead and elections are regularly held, please
>note 
>> that on the project home page.  We're hoping to track the leads so
>that 
>> we have a point of contact for each project.
>
>Proxy maint is coordination point between multiple groups in the
>community and certainly should adhere to GLEP 39.
>
>-- 
>Kristian Fiskerstrand
>OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
>fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

This still reinforces that we don't NEED to have a lead. Gokturk's proposal for a "no lead" option is thus valid and must be honored. Since no one can "accept" that nomination, I second it, making it effective.
-- 
NP-Hardass

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4142 bytes --]