From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B207138334 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 09:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52743E0ECB; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 09:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14348E0E88 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 09:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BBFB335CC8; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 09:47:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?Q?Ch=C3=AD-Thanh?= Christopher =?utf-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n?= Cc: Kristian Fiskerstrand , gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: What should the default acceptable licenses be? References: <5a20bdb0-c571-fd12-2efa-73ee65469a2d@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:47:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5a20bdb0-c571-fd12-2efa-73ee65469a2d@gentoo.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Ch=C3=AD-Thanh?= Christopher =?utf-8?Q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n=22's?= message of "Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:32:37 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 44b1a7aa-829f-4cda-b6e4-5108be0f4614 X-Archives-Hash: e3bde4e41bea0621d2df7c090e6bfd4e --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > No, the impact is considerable. As I pointed out in the previous > discussion[1], it will require a deblobbed kernel among other things, > a different approach to handling sourceless binaries under a free > license (ulm suggested a no-source-code tag), and no small effort in > educating users. This particular point has been addressed in the meantime. We have a "no-source-code" license label which can be used alongside (e.g.) BSD for binary-only packages. > That said, I'm all for it. Gentoo should make users acknowledge when > they install proprietary software. > [1] > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/d2196de6a6c8285bfa9c1b= 789ef88dae --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAlxNfhYACgkQwwkGhRxh wnO9kgf9E+QyQ5nx77GXhaCwT719Idwr32SjehSL/zD/FVEu/KP43EuScnZtJAIP F0Pag15VNi8zkqZNiw47nhBI3K6pMmiB6ddLqIRiWQtKABiy52Zs4VYA1FAsxtI1 Ht55FNHcKnIlY61LLh9HypGOdi8N48ZcsEbbop/O03W26Y/0gHa8UxL4HOICXEgz z8yp2OSbo3gUTmHndaajpO4nYqX37RlLRr0IyV19Y9mpgE4u6YUHmIw7Oe2hcLGd eUi+gevgPlRADxKz6Utj6zrvhD+QpjqXPQM/um5Nue5PqLwBAnxQj3Z6Fbewf6+4 560u9wutqzHOgvw9UzFZo9qpYrQKOQ== =7Tra -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--