From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED90138334 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2B40E08DC; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B130E08DB for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6969340D8D; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:44:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Thomas Deutschmann Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: What should the default acceptable licenses be? References: <18f615b4-dfd4-f0db-a5c4-93c97e7dcbb6@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:44:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Deutschmann's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:34:51 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 90232179-591f-4dd0-a1d8-89ce14a47714 X-Archives-Hash: 056a4d08d0fd9f38d03ba2c6fdf8df0a --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2019-02-12 20:40, Alec Warner wrote: >> This is why I continue to advocate for a deliberate choice based on >> the social contract ("Gentoo is and will remain Free and thus the >> default should be "-* @FREE" rather than some kind of objective >> choice based on 'consequences'; which I think just muddle the point. > Sorry, I don't get this. You understand that a change from >> ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" (active today) > to >> ACCEPT_LICENSE="-* @FREE" > is the same like >> ACCEPT_LICENSE="@FREE" > Isn't it ("-*" isn't needed; at the moment we say "don't prompt for > _any license_ except licenses from @EUAL group")? It is the same when starting from an empty default. IIUC, Portage does its lookup in the order make.globals, then make.defaults, then make.conf, so keeping the "-*" would have the advantage that it overrides the default of previous Portage versions. Otherwise, I don't see how "-* @FREE" (rather than "@FREE") could cause any harm. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAlxj9RwACgkQwwkGhRxh wnMCfQf/R0lZWnjb8WOG63y4kaqvKpoIMfCYsVEXdLkAAx7mGThceaXPK5q2WMak yOcXc9AKXL5j4FKGDoquetu2fqmDoc8x1hK8L8jQzJMan3TtKt4VQ/bgowUOue6D 6xeh+VtUaYpFTOzpuCRSpQhm+ruurCZbgw/V94YnxBESKIO5mWxvooQKnofsVvQ7 Ch86Qz6XnQIIRvER16KjZrNEfnJgkFMX1ZlK94WDvpfnQb7whSovn181r0Bv0eyJ nTQF/wSj7BcOfR/vAaw0wyG7WKRT9a4tPpq2bMtJH60Ww52gsQgABmgE3QarFR9t SCixgNPlojEFlys70KZxi8G2wsWj8w== =eiwA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--