From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v3]
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 19:36:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w6gftyjj3gy.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <833318c1-a337-d023-1722-8b3dda6411a3@gentoo.org> (Michael Orlitzky's message of "Sat, 8 Sep 2018 10:25:03 -0400")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1938 bytes --]
>>>>> On Sat, 08 Sep 2018, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> The Gentoo Certificate of origin says,
>> By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
>>
>> 1 The contribution was created in whole or in part by me...
>>
>> 2 The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of
>> my knowledge, is covered...
>>
>> 3 The contribution is a license text (or a file of similar nature)...
>>
>> 4 The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person
>> who certified (1), (2), (3), or (4), and I have not modified it.
> Do we really want to allow (4)s all the way down?
> That issue aside, I have some doubts about the usefulness of asserting
> (4), which to me sounds like the opposite of what is intended: "someone
> gave it to me and he said it was fine" is a weird defense. Especially if
> the name of the person doesn't appear in the sign-off.
If you certify 4., the commit should already carry a Signed-off-by line
with that other person's name. If not, you must certify it with one of
the other clauses (presumably, 2.).
> I realize we might not be able to do much better in the case of e.g.
> patches from outside contributors, but shouldn't we at least record the
> person's name in that case?
Yes, the idea is that either there is a chain of Signed-off-by lines, or
(if not) that the committer has the responsibility that the contribution
is under a free software license.
Realistically, I won't expect our certification chains to have normally
more than two S-o-b lines (like proxied committer and proxy committer).
> If there's ever a dispute, we might need to track the guy down.
We can also see it more positively, the name should be there to give
credit to the right person. :)
> I also realize that (4) was taken directly from the DCO which presumably
> has had actual lawyers look at it, so take this with a grain of salt.
Ulrich
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-08 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-10 20:34 [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-10 20:49 ` Michał Górny
2018-06-11 16:20 ` Brian Evans
2018-06-11 16:25 ` NP-Hardass
2018-06-11 17:07 ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-11 18:08 ` NP-Hardass
2018-06-11 17:27 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-11 17:57 ` NP-Hardass
2018-06-13 20:35 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-13 20:44 ` William Hubbs
2018-06-17 2:18 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-11 17:45 ` Michał Górny
2018-06-12 6:01 ` Matt Turner
2018-06-17 1:03 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-17 1:39 ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-17 2:14 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-17 2:34 ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-17 2:17 ` Aaron Bauman
2018-06-17 2:39 ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-17 2:52 ` Aaron Bauman
2018-06-17 3:30 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-17 7:09 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-17 7:00 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-17 7:15 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-17 7:38 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-17 8:45 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-17 20:12 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-06-17 20:37 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-17 20:41 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-06-17 23:19 ` Kent Fredric
2018-06-19 17:30 ` [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v2] Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-23 19:39 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-06-23 21:57 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-08-31 15:18 ` [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v3] Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-03 17:40 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-08 11:43 ` Andrew Savchenko
2018-09-08 13:35 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-08 18:17 ` Andrew Savchenko
2018-09-08 18:55 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-08 19:20 ` Justin Lecher
2018-09-08 23:38 ` Andrew Savchenko
2018-09-09 6:15 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-08 14:25 ` Michael Orlitzky
2018-09-08 17:09 ` Michał Górny
2018-09-08 17:36 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2018-09-26 19:25 ` [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v4] Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-27 5:00 ` kuzetsa
2018-09-27 12:00 ` NP-Hardass
2018-09-27 12:42 ` Rich Freeman
2018-09-27 13:08 ` kuzetsa
2018-09-27 13:43 ` Rich Freeman
2018-09-27 14:14 ` kuzetsa
2018-09-27 13:52 ` NP-Hardass
2018-09-27 14:13 ` Rich Freeman
2018-09-27 14:24 ` NP-Hardass
2018-09-27 14:32 ` kuzetsa
2018-09-29 3:15 ` desultory
2018-09-29 7:08 ` Kent Fredric
2018-09-29 9:13 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-09-27 14:32 ` Michał Górny
2018-09-27 14:40 ` kuzetsa
2018-09-28 9:39 ` kuzetsa
2018-09-29 7:46 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-10-02 20:29 ` NP-Hardass
2018-10-02 21:23 ` Michał Górny
2018-10-03 15:48 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-10-03 19:16 ` Andrew Savchenko
2018-10-03 19:28 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=w6gftyjj3gy.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox