From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3B8138334 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1FF0E07DB; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6278E07AE for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C78E3478FC; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:39:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: "Haelwenn \(lanodan\) Monnier" Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-07-21 References: <20190709090238.GA28475@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 09:39:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190709090238.GA28475@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org> (Haelwenn Monnier's message of "Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:02:38 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 579cd44d-5d3b-4162-a98d-3012d3a6d96f X-Archives-Hash: 391a589c6a4a7dc1bf9e4d24411b1f4b --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2019, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > Not sure if as a non-developer I can call for an agenda item but as it > has been in other threads by developers I think there should be a > removal of the "legal name"[1] part of GLEP-76. > It's been driving at least two active contributors away, with a least > one other person having their name outed, which is a seriously bad > flag. (I don't have the link right now to it but could find it at a > later time. And I think it would be better to not send it publicly > anyway) Contributors will need proxy committers in any case, who can then signoff the commit with their real name. This has explicitly been clarified in the meeting when GLEP 76 was accepted [1]: | - Pseudonymous / anonymous contributions would have to be proxied to | ::gentoo by a committer with real name. So, we can discuss your item, but I don't think that it raises anything new that hasn't been addressed in [2]. > [...] > 1: Which is very vague as depending on the jurisdiction you can quite > easily change your name either with a bit of money for the paperwork > or having testimony from people that they know you under this name. Right, but if your government issues a passport with that name, it isn't up to us to question it. Ulrich [1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20180909-summary.txt [2] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20180909.txt (20:15-20:30) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl0piqMACgkQwwkGhRxh wnNy8wf9G0p8G+RkJTsrNPS+IDbwe0Us0N+bEsaHH3e010ztXi7A1nrzCh5z+fWc FZBaic5TMSOapgimuw/trB3xunE5zT96+4cHuKIZPSlos5CudUwIIh5r3cZdlSCb EnMBDKN+gaL04n4L/eeWQVvEh9BrUt/pPmZhMjUTXERlAivO1FnmozxdKBUX3sGg Kz0Wqy2nI5RX5GysjWnL/lg29bGrgdtbmeFpnwr6cHqiTN8eMArUy7RcEdIgN6fC QFKCuAPoynyxK/uMn5jGlJFKwAeR4xzRcIJfmvwTLQuPfeKrhrcHc2b6oNHSJiri 8ved8jgIeGCOmFKLHSw/uc1GquwjHw== =yGVV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--