From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BC113933E for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 23:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18F9EE0C47; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 23:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A349DE0C47 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 23:00:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: "Robin H. Johnson" Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2021-07-11 - call for agenda items In-Reply-To: (Robin H. Johnson's message of "Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:23:43 +0000") References: Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:00:35 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: c66d3902-30f0-424b-9583-430e6537a8cf X-Archives-Hash: 357a63a156dfec7f3fcf5b770e94666c --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2021, Robin H Johnson wrote: >> Using the Gentoo uid as the key would imply that contributors other than >> developers cannot be listed in the file. Is this a valid assumption? > Accepted, I will say we can use email address instead, because that > uniquely identifies both the Committer & Signed-Off by entries. Typically one wouldn't put (only) an e-mail address in a copyright notice, but the author's real name. How about using the author's name plus (optional?) e-mail address as the key? This would also stay close to what the file says for the current single-line entries: "the entity's name and an optional e-mail address". Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmDmMhMPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uk6MH/1TPgWJvrdhnKl/sGRjk/+DXLUuPktiVSwK5 a252i/RaDB2ieAuFa4u+oQ3QF19pBzB3FV0Xv/YXDp+wdNoQKa+C4JCwSzhmWucU tu/PFzQ7fCpHqr5DiOxXbdfCNx2ndfYOQ2/XCFtbTo4Gw9ntTKfCMCtEJqTp31Uu uizJHLAkMsFKvWL4ql0AyiR9jXENtSFDMUmp85LI9/3Yc/jLcWV6eC58iNkiwUIP 7o6/ib/wbi9a3xxKEoSPNs6s9tlsUHqgVg239mvlDQhSTtyHyfpC3+I6Mor7Vc7G uz9NnhOinyIc9a/U0sWB4s0z9/GlbsJaO0l2db22S93QkqkkZUM= =1QX9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--