From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E271382C5 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1CFFE0960; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C67E095F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:13:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Joonas Niilola Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] 'Gentoo in 2020', next round In-Reply-To: <3c2397a7-b273-d1f0-10f5-c1cc367630c9@gentoo.org> (Joonas Niilola's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:26:44 +0200") References: <2120251.vFx2qVVIhK@farino> <3c2397a7-b273-d1f0-10f5-c1cc367630c9@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:13:46 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 883a26fc-64d1-4d9c-8a1d-5b89363d10d1 X-Archives-Hash: 5ea0f1fe8ed3f2ffda96957e476c2525 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Joonas Niilola wrote: > ------ > 2020 featured almost 25500 bugs reported, compared to 15000 in 2019. ... > The total number of bugs closed in 2020 was 23500, compared to 15000 in > 2019. > ------ > 15000 created and closed bugs in 2019 seems suspicious. Could that > number be verified? I see even in 2020 the numbers are very close to > each other. But just in case. IIUC this doesn't imply that all 15000 closed bugs had been filed in 2019. So there wouldn't be anything wrong even if the "closed" number was higher than the "created" number. I wonder however, why not use the exact numbers if we have them? Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmAAGVoPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uG20H/A/YESi7jRCIvrilZ/UDs/1Y8uqKHXMmbeOp ogCurgtQv+a3p0KkAgfLdk4DhSNHhJGNBvNXeKEf+NzYYrgSVyEryrzZIbRExhey e0tS/L4NmolOg1M7gMMzfoXEGweWk8YJMfBqw4fuqOoJiWd5aJHGfnjC0eRorFEH eevNvFfl7Qb2wWezCNO764bNs3KUSw66LFWSttWafoeS5DNI75mBJBMV/GILv607 p+36es6ghC7a3JfrsAb91I7ZxFKNuaM6BBfwBiQ91wQpWCuVslhfNIk/FEhpbUvj QF3G4y2l90HTVdIY8+PBL/fevfu3LEsZrT+WAwoRcb6cBtcN+ck= =qa/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--